Francorp Partner - Marketcorp - Franchising, the #1 Way to Expand Your Business

Business Insight
FRANCHISING – The #1 Way To Expand Your Business
by Kent Boxberger

I was talking with a client of mine the other day, who has 2 company owned locations in the home services business, and he asked me how to grow his business without borrowing lots of money from his bank and hiring more employees. I told him that most businesses who want to grow successfully, have to find extra money and then fund themselves into their growth, to make enough profit to service the debt, which on average takes 2-3 years to turn a profit on the expansion. His next question was, “How can we do it quicker than 2 or 3 years?” The answer is Franchising.
In today’s business climate, companies are looking for more ways to expand their sales and operations. It takes more money and more people. Franchising your business, solves both of those challenges. By franchising your business, you solve the problem of borrowing or using your own money, by partnering with others who invest their money in your business model. Secondly, you solve the personnel problem, because your partner (franchisee) hires and manages the staff to run the business. Picture for a moment, your business having 50 or more locations. Can you fund those locations and employ all those people? In addition, how long do you think it will take to establish those 50 locations? Even if you can, still there’s the risk, red tape and time involved in running the operations successfully. Franchising makes having those 50 locations a much easier task. You don’t fund those locations yourself, nor do you manage and hire the employees, plus the time establishing those 50 locations, is greatly reduced and accomplished with much more ease.
What types of businesses are candidates for Franchising? There are literally thousands of businesses that are franchised and growing. Historically, we think of fast food businesses like McDonald’s, Burger King etc., however, restaurants is only a small percentage of the types of businesses that franchise. Companies such as H&R Block, Ace Hardware, John Deere, Payless Car Rentals, as well as services businesses in the healthcare, medical, advertising, education, high tech, automotive, data processing, financing, real estate, business services and home services arena’s, have also franchised successfully.
To Franchise your business, there are typically only a few requirements to get started. The concept of franchising, is about taking a proven business model that is profitable and duplicating that model successfully. Start-up businesses are not candidates for franchising, due to the fact that there is no financial concept that is proven, nor any history of success. People who buy businesses are looking for a proven system of success that they may invest in, thereby eliminating most of the flaws, risks, mistakes and learning curve that comes with starting a business from scratch. This becomes increasingly important when you consider that according to government statistics, 95% of all start-up businesses in this country fail. This pales in comparison to franchises, which have a 70% record of success.
From an investment standpoint, you have a 70% chance of business success when buying any type of franchise, as opposed to a 5% chance of success, when starting a business on your own from scratch, regardless of how good your idea is, how much money you have or what experience you may bring to the table. Franchises are regulated and have strict requirements by the FTC (Federal Trade Commission). They’re also regulated by most states, which helps protect the Franchisor and Franchisee to bring about the likelihood of more success. Businesses also consider Licensing their business model, as a way of expansion, but in many cases these licensed companies are operating illegally as a franchise. There are specific differences between Licensing and Franchising, that even many good attorneys misinterpret. As with any franchise, still there are risks that accompany any business, no matter what factors are in place – there are failures, as well as great success stories.
The franchise industry concept has been especially strong and growing rapidly, since the 1970’s. The reason, is that it affords people the opportunity to be in business for themselves, run their own ship…………..and have a partnered foundation of associates to work with, who’ve claimed the experience to be successful. If you want to expand your business in the quickest and most economical way possible, then maybe it’s time to consider Franchising. There are hundreds of topics to consider before you do, so be diligent in getting the professional advice required, from franchise experts who have years of experience and success under their belt. Your long term success depends on it.
MarketCorp International, Inc. “The Franchise Experts” ww.MarketCorp.net 678.462.8646 Atlanta, GA USA

McCain's Bailout Gambit

McCain’s bailout gambit
By Alexander Bolton and Mike Soraghan
Posted: 09/24/08 08:27 PM [ET]
The decision by John McCain to suspend his campaign is giving panicky GOP lawmakers political cover and appeared to inject new life into negotiations on a proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial markets.
At press time, Senate Democrats emerged from a meeting with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and reported a conceptual deal they hoped could receive a vote before markets open on Monday.


Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said a bill could be produced as early as Thursday, with debate and a vote likely over the weekend.
Ideally, Durbin said the Senate would finish the bill before Monday.
Republicans have emerged as the chief obstacle to swift passage of President Bush’s bailout proposal, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) held a summit Wednesday with Paulson to try to calm the revolt among lawmakers.
The administration has pulled out all the stops to win support for the package.
President Bush was to address the nation about the bailout on Wednesday night, and lobbying groups with deep ties to Republicans earlier in the day circulated letters urging their allies to support the president’s plan.
Paulson also indicated that the administration was dropping its resistance to limiting the multi-million dollar severance packages offered to executives of firms that take advantage of the bailout.
“The American people are angry about executive compensation,” Paulson said. “We must find a way to address this in the legislation, but we must do so without undermining the program.”
Yet Rep. Tom Cole (Okla.), the chairman of the House Republican campaign committee, declared the only way to save the bailout would be for McCain and Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) to take the lead, and for the Senate to vote before the House.
“These guys are more influential than their votes at this particular time,” Cole said.
He said McCain and Obama were the voices that would matter most to lawmakers wrestling with a difficult vote just weeks before presidential and congressional elections.
“I think they should deal with it first,” Cole said of the Senate. “They have both of the presidential candidates, and it’s hard to see anyone voting for a package if the nominee of their party doesn’t.”
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), a member of the Senate Banking Committee who has participated in talks on the bailout, said Republican senators discussed the need for the upper chamber to take the lead during a private meeting Wednesday afternoon.
“Maybe it would be best at this point for the Senate to take the lead,” said Corker, who said this sentiment is “growing” among his colleagues.
Paulson squeezed the meeting with Pelosi and Boehner between two appearances before congressional committees, at which many Republicans expressed opposition to the rescue plan, while Democrats seemed more accepting, but interested in making changes.
Wall Street markets did not plunge for a third straight day, although the Dow Jones industrial dipped by 29 points. The NASDAQ, the largest U.S. electronic stock market, was up for the day.
Republicans are the key to passing the bailout because Pelosi has told members of her caucus she won’t bring the package to the floor unless there is substantial Republican support. But conservative Republicans have rallied against the plan, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) said earlier this week that Republicans should vote against the it.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said his staff was working with the staff of Sen. Chris Dodd’s (D-Conn.) Banking Committee to reach agreement on a single bill, rather than separate House and Senate versions.
Frank added that he believes Pelosi has a minimum threshold of Republican votes necessary to bring the bill forward, but he said he did not know what that number was.
“They’re not even close to having enough votes,” said Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.), a freshman facing a tough reelection. “This has to be bipartisan.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) pleaded for Republicans to support the package, which conservatives have roundly criticized as too expensive and an overreach of federal power.
Reid said Tuesday that only one Republican on the Banking panel could be counted on to support the proposal first floated by Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Several conservative Republicans continued to voice opposition on Wednesday.
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) complained that the bailout plan was a “slippery slope to socialism.” He said there are more free-market options, such as a suspension of the capital gains tax, that would bring relief to financial markets without intervention.
“The markets are panicking,” added Rep. Gresham Barrett (R-S.C.). “The government doesn’t need to panic too.”
");
//-->


But senior Republicans on the Financial Services Committee were more supportive, urging lawmakers to work with Paulson and Bernanke.
With support apparently slipping, businesses and trade groups not directly affiliated with the financial services industry on Wednesday began to lobby more forcefully in favor of the rescue package, an effort that participants hoped would provide additional political cover to members worried that voters will view the plan as a taxpayer-funded bailout of rich Wall Street investors who made bad bets.
The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, a group that counts 40,000 members, urged Congress “in the strongest terms possible” to approve the administration’s plan.
“This is one of the hardest letters that I’ve ever written, because normally we’re against government intervention in the marketplace,” said Jade West, NAW’s vice president for government relations.
But the crisis warranted sweeping government action, West said, because the fallout of the credit crunch will soon begin to affect the broader business community.
“This is a Main Street, not a Wall Street, position.”
Now the message NAW’s members want carried to Capitol Hill is, “Do something, damn it,” West said.
Lobbyists for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Real Estate Roundtable, the National Federation of Independent Business and the International Franchise Association all urged Congress on Wednesday to act.
David French, vice president of government relations for the International Franchise Association, said franchisees were already reporting difficulty in getting credit.
“Stuff that was available two years ago is just not available today,” French said.
“From our perspective, this is much more than a Wall Street problem.”
Several Democrats said the administration and Bush himself needed to do a better job of explaining to the public the consequences of not passing the bailout.
“I get the why,” said Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.). “But my constituents are asking me why, not how. The administration has to be honest with America about the ‘why.’ ”Jim Snyder contributed to this article.

Entrepreneurs in Today's Economy

Inside Entrepreneurship: Turmoil likely to make angels cautious
By SUSAN SCHRETERSPECIAL TO THE P-I
Q: Getting investors for my startup is essential to moving forward. In your opinion, will the recent roller-coastering of the stock market and the economy in general make finding independent investors more difficult? Or are potential investors looking for alternatives to the stock market?
-- M.P., Seattle
A: Entrepreneurs usually are a highly optimistic and confident breed. But judging from the letters I've received this week, their mood has become more cautious.
Prospective entrepreneurs are questioning the timing of their startups. They ask, "Should I bother to start up in this economy?" or, "If I work at my startup on weekends, can my employer make any claims on my technology?"
I like this wry commentary best: "Susan, since banks and investors have turned me down, can you give me the government bailout address to rescue my failing business?"
While it's clearly too early to make many useful forecasts, I do believe that recent financial market turmoil will affect the psyche of independent angel investors for some time to come.
Unlike venture capital fund managers, angel investors are not paid a salary to invest in entrepreneurial companies. It is a discretionary hobby to them. Further, they invest their own money rather than act on behalf of other institutional investors. This means that the amount of money they budget for new venture deal investments is directly related to the value of their retirement accounts, real estate and security portfolios. If their liquid net worth has plunged dramatically, then expect angels to write fewer checks to young companies.
This is not good news for most startup entrepreneurs, who usually are not far enough along in business development to qualify for venture capital or more traditional asset-based financing offered by commercial lenders.
During the past few days, I've spoken to angel investors from around the country. The most common sentiment expressed by them was a need to get a better handle on the stock market, the overall economy, the fiscal demands on the U.S. government and the value of their portfolios. More active angels suspected that they would have to allocate more money to existing investments that might struggle during a slow economy rather than invest in new opportunities.
Here are some likely responses from venture investors.
Expect angels and venture capitalists to use the current market conditions as an excuse to bring down company valuations. Investors will want to build in "more room" to make money by starting with the lowest valuation possible.
Expect investors to demand more onerous liquidation multiples and preferences like they did in the aftermath of the dot-com meltdown.
Expect investors to favor startup companies that can reasonably reach cash flow break-even sooner rather than later. First-round technology development investors will worry that entrepreneurs may never secure second-round investors needed to finance product introductions. Entrepreneurs will have to look further down the road in developing their financing strategies.
Expect investors to favor entrepreneurs who have a really practical answer about how investors will ultimately get their money back. IPOs will get tougher. Corporations will become more selective in their buyout activities.
To your last question, will angel investors eventually view privately held, high potential companies like yours as a better deal than the seemingly more volatile public markets? Certainly it's a good talking point.
You can strengthen your appeal by looking for every possible way to reduce the perceived risk associated with investing in your company. This means pursuing operating partners to speed progress. It also means lowering your cost structure and checking the credit-worthiness of customers. Like investors, you, too, have to protect every penny you have.
Susan Schreter writes about startup planning and small-business financing for the Seattle P-I. She has an investment banking and buyout background and serves as a coach to entrepreneurs and consultant to corporations. Find more Inside Entrepreneurship columns at seattlepi.com/venture. Send questions about small-business management or raising money for your business to susan@insideentrepreneurship.com or by mail to Inside Entrepreneurship, c/o Seattle P-I Business Section, 101 Elliott Ave. W., Seattle, WA 98119.

Blockbuster to Stick to the Bricks

Blockbuster sticks to the bricks
06:29 PM PT, Sep 23 2008
The instant gratification of video-on-demand and the novelty of movies by snail mail may get many a consumer more excited than an old-fashioned trip to the corner store, but for Blockbuster Inc., the store is still the thing.
The Dallas-based video rental and retail chain, which closed hundreds of stores over the last year, plans to revamp many of its remaining outlets, expand its movie and game offerings, and add more rental and download kiosks.
But it’s still keeping an eye toward increasing Internet-based downloads through Movielink, the digital movie site it acquired last year, and attracting more movie-thru-mail subscribers. Critics say stores are passé, but Blockbuster notes that its mail customers also have the convenience of returning or trading-in their mail-ordered movie at stores — something which Netflix can't do because it doesn't have brick-and-morter outlets (just in case an Ingmar Bergman flick showed up in the mail when you were more in the mood for "Sex and the City").
“Most people read a lot of interesting headlines, and we enjoy the headlines, about Netflix, Amazon, Apple, so forth,” says Tom Casey, Blockbuster’s chief financial officer, during a presentation at Thomas Weisel Partners’ Annual Consumer Conference on Tuesday. “But what you need to understand is we really have a market that we address that’s nearly $36 billion in size. Video-on-demand is actually pretty small.”
That $36-billion figure is the total market for DVD's and game sales — where Blockbuster has been expanding — and movie rentals. Blockbuster has a 40% share of the $9.6 billion movie rental business, of which in-store rentals account for more than half the total revenue, followed by mail subscription and video-on-demand, according to the company.
Blockbuster reported a loss of $44.7 million, or 23 cents a share, in the second quarter, ended June 30, compared to a $34.2 million loss in the same period last year. But same-store revenue rose 9%, and the company reaffirmed that it expects a profit for the year.
“Traffic tends to transfer to a nearby Blockbuster whenever they close a store,” says Arvind Bhatia, an analyst at Sterne Agee & Leach, Inc., adding that he estimates a “normal attrition” of about 150 store closures in the U.s. this year and next. Blockbuster now has about 8,000 stores worldwide.
"Financially, they're doing well," he adds.
Blockbuster plans to increase its stock of rental and retail movies and games at each store as well as pay for store refurbishing, from paint and carpeting to adding Blu-ray kiosks. Some stores have already undergone a broader remodeling, complete with gaming stations and cafes.
“Too many of the stores still look like the old blue-and-yellow 90s VHS stores,” Casey says.
And analysts think Blockbuster still has life left in its stores — particularly on the retail market — before the Internet or video-on-demand becomes the dominant delivery system.
“We all have the idiot friends who have collections of hundreds of DVDs. Nobody is going to collect 100s of DVDs on their hard drives,” said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter. “And the movie studios don’t make as much" on rentals or on-demand services, where the profit margins are smaller.
Pachter notes that as long as Blockbuster gets customers in stores and studios release movies on DVD before they allow video-on-demand and streaming online, the company will thrive.
“Blockbuster says, why not buy a movie while you’re in here? What else can they sell? Popcorn, video games, maybe a TV or an iPod,” Pachter said. “They’re merchandising better, and that’s absolutely working.”
— Swati Pandey

Yum! Donates $80 Million to WFP

Yum! Donates $80 Million to WFP
2008-09-25 — The Clinton Global Initiative today recognized Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM - News) for its worldwide commitment to raise and donate $80 million over the next five years to help the World Food Programme (WFP) and others provide 200 million meals for hungry school children in developing countries. In addition, Yum! pledged over the next five years to donate 20 million hours of hunger relief volunteer service in the communities in which it operates; $200 million worth of its prepared food to hunger agencies in the United States and use the company's marketing clout to generate awareness of the hunger problem, and convince others to become part of the solution.
President Bill Clinton announced Yum's commitment during a special Plenary Session that made school feeding a top priority in the fight to end global hunger. The commitment will mean that 1 million children could come to school every day for an entire year and receive a nourishing meal.
The funds will be raised through Yum! Brands World Hunger Relief campaign, the world's largest private sector hunger relief effort to help end world hunger. World Hunger Relief supports the United Nations WFP and other hunger relief agencies.
"Hunger is unacceptable. As a society, we should not and can not tolerate the fact that nearly 925 million people are starving and go to bed hungry every day. As the world's largest restaurant company, we believe it is our privilege and responsibility to find a meaningful solution to this critical problem," says David C. Novak, Chairman and CEO of Yum! Brands.
Global hunger has reached epic proportions--reaching nearly 1 billion people--due to the convergence of higher commodity and global food prices; increased competition for products that produce energy; severe droughts and floods due to climate change and increasing demand from growing economies in Asia and South America.
"We hope to move millions of people from hunger to hope through our efforts," said Novak. The company's employees and franchisees will be volunteering their time around the globe at hunger relief agencies, food banks, soup kitchens and launching fundraisers. The Yum! Foundation also will be donating to the cause by covering the WFP's administrative fee so that funds collected from customers and employees will go directly toward feeding people. Funds raised for WFP go directly to the areas of greatest need, feeding poor school children in the developing world and helping villages become self-sustainable. Every U.S. dollar raised during World Hunger Relief 2008 will provide 4 meals for hungry children all over the world.
During this year's World Hunger Relief campaign, Yum! plans to generate the equivalent of nearly $50 million in awareness of the hunger issue through television and print advertising, public service announcements, public relations, web-based communications and in-restaurant posters and signage. In addition, the company is leveraging the power of the internet to reach millions of people through the www.fromhungertohope.com Web site and other on-line activity.

Sonic Franchise Stores Outperform Company Operations

Sonic slips on same-store sales outlook
Associated Press 09.24.08, 5:37 PM ET

NEW YORK -
Several analysts trimmed their fourth-quarter profit estimates for Sonic Corp. on Wednesday, after the drive-through restaurant chain said preliminary fourth-quarter same-store sales were "slightly negative."
Shares of Sonic fell 53 cents, or 3.3 percent, to $15.41.
After Tuesday's closing bell, Sonic said same-store sales were positive nationwide for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31, but partner drive-in sales declined for the fiscal year and in the fourth quarter. Same-store sales measure sales at stores open at least a year and are considered a good gauge of ongoing retail health.
In the fourth quarter, Sonic said same-store sales were positive at franchised drive-in locations, but same-store sales for partner drive-ins were "significantly negative," causing slightly negative same-store sales systemwide. Partner drive-ins are locations where the company owns a majority interest.
Oklahoma City-based Sonic is set to report fourth-quarter results Oct. 16, and analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expect 35 cents per share in earnings for the fourth quarter.
Stifel Nicolaus & Co. analyst Steve West trimmed his quarterly profit forecast by a penny to 34 cents, and expects Hurricane Ike and input costs to weigh on fiscal 2009 results. West said the impact from Hurricane Ike is much worse than previously expected because of massive power outages.
West, however, kept a "Buy" rating on the stock, expecting new products to drive sales and boost margins.
Meanwhile, KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst Lynne Collier, who rates the stock "Hold," also trimmed her fourth-quarter estimate and noted higher commodity costs and softening consumer spending. The company has significant exposure to rising beef and dairy costs, Collier said.
Collier also said a happy hour promotion increased customer traffic, but ended up hurting the average check.

Franchise Brokers

People often ask me about franchise brokers. On the surface, the idea of a franchise broker seems simple enough. Brokers put buyers and sellers together so whether a buyer or a seller, brokers would seem to be a very important component in the equation.

The fact is, brokers get paid to put buyers and sellers together. After all, they need to get paid too. Thus, by the pure nature of that relationship, they typically have a biased opinion. Odds are, they are representing a party that pays them upon procurement of a sale.

So, let us look at this from both perspectives, the franchisor and prospective franchisee.

For you franchisors or perspective franchisors - Brokers fill a void as a nice additional franchise sales outlet, but do not make the mistake in thinking that brokers are going to be your only source of sales for your franchise company. We have found that companies that sell their own franchises have the greatest success in the long run. The reason for this is that a company selling their own franchises has to live with them for the term of the contract. This causes in house sales teams to have more stringent criteria placed on them.

Thus, my advice is to first deploy an in-house sales initiative. In order to be successful with an in-house sales force, they will need to deploy a marketing program in order to generate leads for those sales people to follow up with. This strategy needs to address the following marketing opportunities:

1. Internet
2. Trade Shows
3. PR / Publicity
4. Print
5. Direct mail

Francorp believes that this multi-pronged approach is the best way to address franchise sales and marketing.

As a secondary plan, brokers can add additional prospects to the equation. Though, be weary of deploying a marketing program and sending all of your leads to outside brokers. I would not recommend that strategy. Your leads are then likely to be distributed among that brokers other franchisor clients in the event that they have a qualified franchisee prospect that is not interested in your particular business off hand. My advice would be to only use brokers that generate their own leads. In addition, be careful not to enter into an exclusive broker arrangement.

For those of you that are prospective franchisees, be weary of brokers steering you to a particular business in which they are obtaining a commission. Not all franchise companies pay commissions. What happens if you work with a broker and they do not show you a particular franchise that you are interested in learning more about? GO DIRECTLY TO THAT COMPANY.

There are many brokers that are great people and and help people find their dream business. Though, brokers are not for everyone. I am not aware of any large national brokerage networks that are paid directly by the buyer. All of the brokers that I have met are paid by the actual franchise companies upon the sale of a franchise. In a perfect world, you perspective buyers should work with a broker for a fee that you pay so that your interests are being represented, not those of a hand full of franchisors.

Now you sellers and prospective buyers are in a better informed position to be able to find the right opportunities that are out there for you all. You heard it here from Francorp, the franchising leader.